<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe &#8220;Moviestar&#8221; Makes Silverlight Irrelevant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.damnhandy.com/2007/08/21/adobe-moviestar-makes-silverlight-irrelevant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.damnhandy.com/2007/08/21/adobe-moviestar-makes-silverlight-irrelevant/</link>
	<description>A blog about Java, REST, and other stuff.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mr chas</title>
		<link>http://www.damnhandy.com/2007/08/21/adobe-moviestar-makes-silverlight-irrelevant/#comment-69126</link>
		<dc:creator>mr chas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.damnhandy.com/2007/08/21/adobe-moviestar-makes-silverlight-irrelevant/#comment-69126</guid>
		<description>Since when does movie star support an entire object oriented coding platform (in case you don't know that would be .NET). Adobe has no hope of keeping up with MS on development tools and integration. Adobe needs to stick to photoshop. Flash is gonna die.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since when does movie star support an entire object oriented coding platform (in case you don&#8217;t know that would be .NET). Adobe has no hope of keeping up with MS on development tools and integration. Adobe needs to stick to photoshop. Flash is gonna die.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ALR</title>
		<link>http://www.damnhandy.com/2007/08/21/adobe-moviestar-makes-silverlight-irrelevant/#comment-44300</link>
		<dc:creator>ALR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 05:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.damnhandy.com/2007/08/21/adobe-moviestar-makes-silverlight-irrelevant/#comment-44300</guid>
		<description>What a volley.

http://java.sys-con.com/read/424590.htm

Unless Microsoft or Adobe make available ABC's "Lost" on Streaming HD within my browser, who gives a shoe?

S,
ALR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a volley.</p>
<p><a href="http://java.sys-con.com/read/424590.htm" rel="nofollow">http://java.sys-con.com/read/424590.htm</a></p>
<p>Unless Microsoft or Adobe make available ABC&#8217;s &#8220;Lost&#8221; on Streaming HD within my browser, who gives a shoe?</p>
<p>S,<br />
ALR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.damnhandy.com/2007/08/21/adobe-moviestar-makes-silverlight-irrelevant/#comment-42301</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.damnhandy.com/2007/08/21/adobe-moviestar-makes-silverlight-irrelevant/#comment-42301</guid>
		<description>However p1 implements ISO standards whereas p0 is still trying to lock you into proprietary codecs. Sure Adobe isn't the shining star of openness, but at least the are standards based approach. The same can't be said for Silverlight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>However p1 implements ISO standards whereas p0 is still trying to lock you into proprietary codecs. Sure Adobe isn&#8217;t the shining star of openness, but at least the are standards based approach. The same can&#8217;t be said for Silverlight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eokyere</title>
		<link>http://www.damnhandy.com/2007/08/21/adobe-moviestar-makes-silverlight-irrelevant/#comment-42277</link>
		<dc:creator>eokyere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.damnhandy.com/2007/08/21/adobe-moviestar-makes-silverlight-irrelevant/#comment-42277</guid>
		<description>1. a lot of people give oohs and aahs about feature f1 of product p0 (which is in the family of product p1)
2. product p1 now implements f1
3. product p0 is now irrelevant

huh?????  so you feel your views are relevant? oh, gawd, these fanboys! ;)

-- eokyere</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. a lot of people give oohs and aahs about feature f1 of product p0 (which is in the family of product p1)<br />
2. product p1 now implements f1<br />
3. product p0 is now irrelevant</p>
<p>huh?????  so you feel your views are relevant? oh, gawd, these fanboys! <img src='http://www.damnhandy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>&#8211; eokyere</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
