<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Java on Mac OS X Leopard to be 64-bit, resolution independent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.damnhandy.com/2007/06/13/java-on-mac-os-x-leopard-to-be-64-bit-resolution-independent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.damnhandy.com/2007/06/13/java-on-mac-os-x-leopard-to-be-64-bit-resolution-independent/</link>
	<description>A blog about Java, REST, and other stuff.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Le Touilleur Express &#187; Mac OS 10.5 est sorti mais Java 6 ne marche pas pour l&#8217;instant</title>
		<link>http://www.damnhandy.com/2007/06/13/java-on-mac-os-x-leopard-to-be-64-bit-resolution-independent/#comment-70306</link>
		<dc:creator>Le Touilleur Express &#187; Mac OS 10.5 est sorti mais Java 6 ne marche pas pour l&#8217;instant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.damnhandy.com/2007/06/13/java-on-mac-os-x-leopard-to-be-64-bit-resolution-independent/#comment-70306</guid>
		<description>[...] le monde y va de son petit billet. Sur JavaLobby ou sur le blog de David Herron. Sur le site DamnHandy on apprend qu&#8217;il est hors de question que Java6 soit abandonné sur Mac OS X. C&#8217;est [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] le monde y va de son petit billet. Sur JavaLobby ou sur le blog de David Herron. Sur le site DamnHandy on apprend qu&#8217;il est hors de question que Java6 soit abandonné sur Mac OS X. C&#8217;est [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Le Touilleur Express &#187; Leopard, Mac OS 10.5 est sorti sans Java 6 pour l&#8217;instant</title>
		<link>http://www.damnhandy.com/2007/06/13/java-on-mac-os-x-leopard-to-be-64-bit-resolution-independent/#comment-70033</link>
		<dc:creator>Le Touilleur Express &#187; Leopard, Mac OS 10.5 est sorti sans Java 6 pour l&#8217;instant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.damnhandy.com/2007/06/13/java-on-mac-os-x-leopard-to-be-64-bit-resolution-independent/#comment-70033</guid>
		<description>[...] Tout le monde y va de son petit billet. Sur JavaLobby ou sur le blog de David Herron. Sur le site DamnHandy on apprend qu&#8217;il est hors de question que Java6 soit abandonné sur Mac OS X. C&#8217;est [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tout le monde y va de son petit billet. Sur JavaLobby ou sur le blog de David Herron. Sur le site DamnHandy on apprend qu&#8217;il est hors de question que Java6 soit abandonné sur Mac OS X. C&#8217;est [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Murray</title>
		<link>http://www.damnhandy.com/2007/06/13/java-on-mac-os-x-leopard-to-be-64-bit-resolution-independent/#comment-51344</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 03:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.damnhandy.com/2007/06/13/java-on-mac-os-x-leopard-to-be-64-bit-resolution-independent/#comment-51344</guid>
		<description>Steve doesn't get that java developers, accustomed to the transparency of OSS, will not stand for the way apple does business. Even though it appears that apple is supporting Java, the secrecy is making developers give up.

As for me - I got burned buying the very very last PPC 12" powerbook. A week after I had parted with my cash, I regretted it.

However, all work here in Canberra is Java 1.4.2 or 5, so not having java 6 is not a huge deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve doesn&#8217;t get that java developers, accustomed to the transparency of OSS, will not stand for the way apple does business. Even though it appears that apple is supporting Java, the secrecy is making developers give up.</p>
<p>As for me - I got burned buying the very very last PPC 12&#8243; powerbook. A week after I had parted with my cash, I regretted it.</p>
<p>However, all work here in Canberra is Java 1.4.2 or 5, so not having java 6 is not a huge deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DamnHandy : &#187; No Mention of Java 6 on Leopard Features Page</title>
		<link>http://www.damnhandy.com/2007/06/13/java-on-mac-os-x-leopard-to-be-64-bit-resolution-independent/#comment-50812</link>
		<dc:creator>DamnHandy : &#187; No Mention of Java 6 on Leopard Features Page</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.damnhandy.com/2007/06/13/java-on-mac-os-x-leopard-to-be-64-bit-resolution-independent/#comment-50812</guid>
		<description>[...] code. So we know Java is there, we also know it&#8217;s been tweaked for DTrace. We also know that Java on Leopard will be 64-bit. And we also know that Apple has been working on a Java 6 implementation for some time [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] code. So we know Java is there, we also know it&#8217;s been tweaked for DTrace. We also know that Java on Leopard will be 64-bit. And we also know that Apple has been working on a Java 6 implementation for some time [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jónas Tryggvi</title>
		<link>http://www.damnhandy.com/2007/06/13/java-on-mac-os-x-leopard-to-be-64-bit-resolution-independent/#comment-40408</link>
		<dc:creator>Jónas Tryggvi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 14:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.damnhandy.com/2007/06/13/java-on-mac-os-x-leopard-to-be-64-bit-resolution-independent/#comment-40408</guid>
		<description>We were thinking of switching to macs for developers in our company, until we found out that we couldn't use JDK 6, and how Apple seems to manage updates of the JVM for the Mac. I found that out the hard way by buying a 24" iMac .. that I boot in Windows for Java development.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We were thinking of switching to macs for developers in our company, until we found out that we couldn&#8217;t use JDK 6, and how Apple seems to manage updates of the JVM for the Mac. I found that out the hard way by buying a 24&#8243; iMac .. that I boot in Windows for Java development.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fireblaze</title>
		<link>http://www.damnhandy.com/2007/06/13/java-on-mac-os-x-leopard-to-be-64-bit-resolution-independent/#comment-40281</link>
		<dc:creator>Fireblaze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 12:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.damnhandy.com/2007/06/13/java-on-mac-os-x-leopard-to-be-64-bit-resolution-independent/#comment-40281</guid>
		<description>Java is Dead on MacOS X, all my companies customers have to switch to another platform to take advantage of the new features in my companies business system, and yes its an auto-platform-install on all OS except MacOS X, which doesnt have Java 1.6. The Business System I work on upgrades every 3 months. So a over 10 months delay =&#62; 3 upgrades with plenty on new features like mailing, better support pages, desktop intergration, warningflag in systemtray, etc... almost all of Java 1.6 new features is used to improve the usability of the system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Java is Dead on MacOS X, all my companies customers have to switch to another platform to take advantage of the new features in my companies business system, and yes its an auto-platform-install on all OS except MacOS X, which doesnt have Java 1.6. The Business System I work on upgrades every 3 months. So a over 10 months delay =&gt; 3 upgrades with plenty on new features like mailing, better support pages, desktop intergration, warningflag in systemtray, etc&#8230; almost all of Java 1.6 new features is used to improve the usability of the system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Geek Errante &#183; El Geek Errante: transmisión #04</title>
		<link>http://www.damnhandy.com/2007/06/13/java-on-mac-os-x-leopard-to-be-64-bit-resolution-independent/#comment-38680</link>
		<dc:creator>El Geek Errante &#183; El Geek Errante: transmisión #04</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 19:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.damnhandy.com/2007/06/13/java-on-mac-os-x-leopard-to-be-64-bit-resolution-independent/#comment-38680</guid>
		<description>[...] Confirmado: Java 6 está en Leopard. ¿Pero sólo en la versión de 64bits?: link link link [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Confirmado: Java 6 está en Leopard. ¿Pero sólo en la versión de 64bits?: link link link [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
