Comments on: JBoss AOP v.s AspectJ 5: Part 1 http://www.damnhandy.com/2006/01/09/jboss-aop-vs-aspectj-5-part-1/ A blog about Java, REST, and other stuff. Sat, 06 Sep 2008 00:32:09 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 By: Ryan http://www.damnhandy.com/2006/01/09/jboss-aop-vs-aspectj-5-part-1/#comment-58 Ryan Wed, 11 Jan 2006 01:41:53 +0000 http://www.damnhandy.com/?p=40#comment-58 If you re-read the page eu, you'll see that I do mention creation AspectJ aspect using annotation Driven development. In fact, my next post on the topic covers this extensively. I did not mention AspectJ's XML pointcut definition since I haven't used that feature yet and second, I don't see the need to. Just FYI. If you re-read the page eu, you’ll see that I do mention creation AspectJ aspect using annotation Driven development. In fact, my next post on the topic covers this extensively. I did not mention AspectJ’s XML pointcut definition since I haven’t used that feature yet and second, I don’t see the need to. Just FYI.

]]> By: eu http://www.damnhandy.com/2006/01/09/jboss-aop-vs-aspectj-5-part-1/#comment-57 eu Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:03:02 +0000 http://www.damnhandy.com/?p=40#comment-57 Your information about AspectJ is quite outdated. It also support annotation driven aspects and they can be defined in xml file. I guess currently there are no practical reasons to use JBoss AOP... Your information about AspectJ is quite outdated. It also support annotation driven aspects and they can be defined in xml file. I guess currently there are no practical reasons to use JBoss AOP…

]]> By: Ryan http://www.damnhandy.com/2006/01/09/jboss-aop-vs-aspectj-5-part-1/#comment-56 Ryan Tue, 10 Jan 2006 02:29:29 +0000 http://www.damnhandy.com/?p=40#comment-56 Considering the AOP user forum is only about a month or old, It's now wonder it appears deserted. The user forum was created due the fact that users were posting too many questions to the developer forum and apparently many folks have yet to catch on :) Considering the AOP user forum is only about a month or old, It’s now wonder it appears deserted. The user forum was created due the fact that users were posting too many questions to the developer forum and apparently many folks have yet to catch on :)

]]> By: x http://www.damnhandy.com/2006/01/09/jboss-aop-vs-aspectj-5-part-1/#comment-54 x Mon, 09 Jan 2006 16:31:50 +0000 http://www.damnhandy.com/?p=40#comment-54 It's no longer a matter of which one is best. AspectJ is the de facto standard and hardly anyone users JBoss AOP (see their deserted forums). And actually, I happen to think the merge of AspectJ/Aspectwerkz is orders of magnitude cleaner and more powerful than JBoss AOP anyway. For once, we have a defacto standard that's actually good, let's all use it :-) It’s no longer a matter of which one is best. AspectJ is the de facto standard and hardly anyone users JBoss AOP (see their deserted forums).

And actually, I happen to think the merge of AspectJ/Aspectwerkz is orders of magnitude cleaner and more powerful than JBoss AOP anyway. For once, we have a defacto standard that’s actually good, let’s all use it :-)

]]>